05.Okt.1999
Colin-Stewart Bridge Deady per eMail
|
KOSH summery 27
KOSH [Kommunity Orientated Software Hardware]
Weekly Summary
Week Commencing: 18th September 1999
Number: 027
Mailing List: kosh-general@iconimaging.net
I'm happy to receive comments on this summary (and corrections if I have made
mistakes). Email me (Bridge) at kosh-scribe@mythicz.u-net.com
In the mailing list this week, the following items were discussed.
a)
Subject: KOSH is back!
This is repeated and expanded from last week in case anyone missed it.
Summary of debate: It never really went away, it just went a bit quiet for a
while. Please note the following items for KOSH:
1) Email address is kosh-general@.iconimaging.net
(thanks to Jason Radford for fixing this).
2) The KOSH website is located on a mirror at
http://www.gpwebb.freeserve.co.uk/kosh/index.html
(thanks to Greg Webb for this)
3) The KOSH booklist remains at
http://www.snowcrash.u-net.com/kosh/booklist.html
(thanks to John Chandler for this)
4) If you have a query such as "where did that bit of KOSH
info go?" then please email me (Bridge) at
kosh.scribe@mythicz.u-net.com and I'll either have it to
hand or know someone that does.
5) A further KOSH website at http://kosh.convergence.org may
have been setup by the time that your read this.
(thanks to Convergence International for this)
b)
Subject: Compatibility via KOSH
Summary of debate: As there are many new "Operating Systems" in development it
was mentioned that there could be compatibility issues
between them. It was suggested that KOSH could provide a
layer on -any- OS to intercept -any- file in ".kosh" format
(whether picture, animation, text, sound, etc) and then
convert it invisibly in the background to a native format
for any particular OS and associated software to understand.
It was immediately (and justly) pointed out that we should
not need file dependencies (.kosh). Further, that this
appears to be a universal datatypes and translation system
which would be difficult to retrofit to existing systems.
c)
Subject: Consolidating KOSH
Summary of debate: We have got lots of ideas sitting on file, but not a huge
amount happening with a lot of them - or at least that
appears to be the situation. It was suggested that the areas
that we have information that needs to be furthered are (to
quote):
- The various ideas from the mailinglists, but not all formalised
- The beginnings of the work of the FDE group
- Explanatory documents from the LA group
- Preliminary draft documents from the survey group
- A simple website
Suggested is that we start with the Working Groups listing
page to get formal items completed. Further, the discussions
we have had on the web site should be properly prepared and
presented. It would be good to go through all the summaries
and individual mails (where appropriate) to get a clearer
picture of exactly what we all want. We could have
people looking at individual topics (as we have with
with migration for example) and then presenting them for us
to see more clearly.
It was suggested that the way that this could work is that
the people interested in a particular subject would
voluntarily be forming a Working Group to advance the
subject further, and when finished present the result back
to the general ML.
Perhaps we could us an organic living document approach.
Each person in an informal WG would hold the document for a
week or two at a time, add their ideas and correct the
previous holder's mistakes (agreed by both parties), then
pass it on to the next person. When passed around a turn
without getting any more changes, the document would be
trimmed, signed and posted to the ML for a quick review
(with any minor modifications if needed) and then finally
posted to the website. This however could take a long time
to produce final documents.
It was suggested that such groups be kept between 3-6 people
to allow working documents to be produced in a relatively
short timespan.
Alternatively, issue a copy to each person and then assign
someone (not necessarily part of the work group) to compile
the result and issue a new version until the cycle of
feedback ends.
If anyone would like to volunteer to get involved in any way
with this please contact me at kosh-scribe@mythicz.u-net.com
As this type of work is informal it is up to the
participants of each IWG (Informal Working Group) to decide
how they would like to proceed. All offers of help
gratefully received.
d)
Subject: Introductory KOSH website
Summary of Debate: Marcus Petersson has written some material for an
introductory website to KOSH-OS (thanks Marcus). Watch this
space for more information.
e)
Subject: Hello ta y'all
Summary of debate: As kosh-general@iconimaging.net gets its feet planted
firmly on the ground once more there is a definite trend for
KOSHans all over the place to announce that they are back -
which is nice and gives one a warm and cosy feeling.
f)
Subject: KOSH is not vapourware
Summary of debate: Please can everyone keep an eye out for posts to newsgroups
and mailing lists saying "KOSH is vapourware" or words to
that effect so that we can reply and state that we do indeed
still exist.
g)
Subject: KOSH Website new articles
Summary of debate: On an almost regular basis Greg Webb is placing new articles
on the KOSH website. Please go take a look as they are quite
interesting.
h)
Subject: Phoenix Platform Consortium
Summary of debate: A lot of information on Phoenix was passed across the KOSH
website but seeing as its not KOSH unfortunately it's not
getting scribed here except to say that readers are directed
to last weeks summary ksum25.txt which contains some quotes
on Phoenix.
i)
Subject: Lentil
Summary of debate: This is a part of the LA group's work. The complete document
library is at workinggroups la1/description/0000001.html
but the specific LENTIL docs are at workinggroups
la1/description/lentil.html
j)
Subject: Palm OS
Summary of debate: Continuing with the theme of giving credit to other systems,
this week's brief interlude is directed towards Palm OS as
featured in the rather nifty Palm Pilots. To quote one
scribee "PalmOS is an elegant solution packed into
surprisingly modest hardware, and a joy to use and
program... an Amiga for the pocket". And there you have it.
k)
Subject: KOSH Booklist Mirrors
Summary of debate: The excellent KOSH Booklist is mirrored on the many KOSH
mirrors. Requests for books are actively encouraged and
should be e-mailed to metaljoe@snowcrash.u-net.com with
"KOSH Books" in the subject line.
l)
Subject: KOSH Website name lists
Summary of debate: The KOSH website has sections to list developers, users,
journalists and retailers etc. It was suggested that the
names of all those known to KOSH at this time be listed on
the site to show that KOSH does indeed have people involved.
At the moment this information is "lost somewhere in the
post" due to the problems we've been having. If people could
go to workinggroups individu.txt on the website, save the
page, fill it in and email it to greg@gpwebb.freeserve.co.uk
we can fill in all the proper details on the website again.
m)
Subject: Why KOSH?
Summary of debate: A brief quote for you from one scribee that gives a further
insight into the rationale behind KOSH:
"KOSH tries to implement an object sea, which will be a rather radically
new paradigm in operating systems and probably also the way of using a
computer from the user's point of view - much more enabling than it used
to be."
n)
Subject: Offline KOSH Web Summaries
Summary of debate: It was pointed out that a number of people have pay per
minute access to the internet and that having to write and
post a summary for a KOSH ML online would cost quite a bit.
A suggestion that there could be an offline version was
made although how this would be implemented would need
carefully considering.
It was mentioned that the summary could be done offline and
that cut and past could be used to place it into the correct
forms. This would take about 5 to 10 minutess at the most.
(ps)
[Meldung: 05. Okt. 1999, 08:00] [Kommentare: 0]
[Per E-Mail versenden] [Druck-Version] [ASCII-Version]
|